Morgan Sindall Image |
Very interesting comparisons were made between the traditional on-site and off-site delivery methodologies. The statistics prove that the offssite method beat traditional in terms of programme, working at height, temporary works, standardisaation, foundation load, design life. But about 1% more expensive - which maybe be considered a lot in these lean times. Lessons were learnt in respect of oquality - surprising as the repeated manufacture in factory onditions should have solved this issue. The units were “complete” including IT and fire alarms.
BRE Image |
On the subject of Cross Laminated Timber - The 2 speakers were Gavin and Sophie, academies designed by Sheppard Robson & Ramboll. An individual CLT component can be 13.5m x 2.95m x 200mm thick. Transportation becomes a limiting factor. Construction gives a good air tightness quality (a la Passivhaus). Unlike the component modular the space in the academies is created and then sub-divided. This means that future teaching methods (whatever they may be) and thus larger smaller spaces can be created / re-configured. The aesthetics in having so much wood is of course a very personal thing. Wood is more forgiving in terms of knocks and bumps.The Q&A afterwards brought up the question of fire rating – A very erudite answer was given whereby it is easier to set fire to a match than it is to a log!
Two very different and interesting takes on innovative construction methods. As with all events it was topped off with ample time to network and, as is the custom, enjoy a few glasses of wine!